Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Hitler, Nabuang sa Hindi Pagpasa ng RH Bill Ngayong Taon

Friends,

While we're taking care of various concerns in preparation for Christmas Day, then working to be in solidarity with our countrymen affected by the flooding and landslides in Cagayan de Oro and Iligan, let's also take time to watch this short parody that somehow summarizes the highlights of this year's fight against the RH bill. It is meant to be light and funny, but also informative. This is backed up by facts.

Don't forget to click on "like" on YouTube because too many "dislikes" will lead it to be taken down.



The Hitler Video has reached a lot of pro lifers who are unanimous in saying that the person who did this is a genius!  Now all we have to do is to reshare it.  The following references were dug up re the major points discussed in the video. If you would be resharing the video, reshare it with the following references.

Fact References:

1. 350 pesos per hakot -- see Inquirer article:http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/103857/no-delay-but-rh-bill-won%E2%80%99t-be-pas... -- The group scheduled the "peak" of its pro-RH rally for September and set aside P1,750,000 to organize a rally of "at least 5,000 people." Each participant was supposed to receive P350.

2. More Pro-life People than Anti-Life --http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reproductive_Health_Bill#Rallies

3. RH Bill can be defeated at Senate:http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/109363/hasty-vote-will-kill-rh-bill%E2%80%94enrile

4. Million of dollars of funding -- http://cbcpforlife.com/?p=5141

5. Pro-RH Groups back abortion -- http://cbcpforlife.com/?p=3477

6. Cabral admitted that pills cause breast cancer -http://opinion.inquirer.net/5067/chant-the-rh-mantras

7. TV Debates won by Pro-life: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reproductive_Health_Bill#Opinion_polls_and_TV_de...

8. Pro RH stats are wrong (maternal death, abortion) -http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/49029/studies-show-maternal-deaths-in-philippine... / http://cbcpforlife.com/?p=3512

9. Non-existent lobby groups (not registered or revoked) getting massive funding -- http://cbcpforlife.com/?p=5178

10. Pro-Life Victory of 2011 - http://www.sunstar.com.ph/manila/local-news/2011/12/11/anti-rh-groups-declare...

11. Population Control connection with Hitler-http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?articleid=399988 / http://newworldorderuniversity.com/?p=3930


Thursday, October 20, 2011

Friday, September 30, 2011

http://cbcpforlife.com/?p=3891

Various youth sectors unite to support 9YL, launch youth alliance



MANILA, Sept. 29, 2011–The event that gathered nine young lawmakers who have declared their opposition to House Bill 4244 also served as the launching of Youth United for the Philippines or YUP! a new coalition of youth groups united by their objective of affirming real needs of “education, jobs and health care for all,” and backing the solons who serve as the “voice of the youth,” according to Lanao del Norte Rep. Fatima Aliah Dimaporo.

Current member organizations of YUP! are the University of Asia and the Pacific’s CATALYST, World Youth Alliance Asia Pacific, Live Pure Movement, Pro-Life Youth Philippines, YouthPinoy.com and CFCP Youth for Family and Life among others.

University of the Philippines student John Juat composed a poem in “tribute” to the nine young Congress leaders posted on his Facebook wall.

“If we should truly progress, we should have one vision. We should try to find a way to end graft and corruption. Use our wealth wisely, ensure its proper allocation, rather than promote harmful means to limit population,” part of it read.

Expressions of dedication and support have also not been exclusively from among students. Pregnant young mother Marielle Abella, who attended the event with other expectant women, read her message to the solons after the main rally, expressing her gratitude for their “courage.”

 

“Ang inyong pagtutol sa RH bill ay kasagutan sa aming patuloy na panalangin, na sanay’ maliwanagan ang ating mga mambabatas, sa tunay na makabubuti sa ating lipunan tungkol sa usaping ito,” Abella said.

Paolo Sandejas, a third-grader from Southridge School, also recited a message of thanks to the lawmakers.

“Thank you for fighting against the RH bill… Don’t worry if the pro-RH people will attack you. We the Filipino children are behind you, we will defend you,” he said. (CBCP for Life)


Tuesday, September 27, 2011

YUP group on Facebook


Tina Avenido posted in La Tertulia.
A new group called YUP! has just been created....
Tina Avenido5:20pm Sep 25
A new group called YUP! has just been created. "YUP is a youth coalition that advocates real long-term progress for the Philippines. We believe that following reason and ethics will actualize the future we deserve."

YUP! needs more than 200 fans. Please forward the message below to your friends and please ask them to register their youth groups to us and ask all their members to join YUP!

Check out the page and LIKE it at:

http://www.facebook.com/weareyup
Please read on for the latest about YUP! and how you can support it.
---------
The pro-RH camp are claiming that the young people are asking congress to pass the RH bill. We do not think it is true. Can you help us spread a youth coalition called YUP! (youth united for the philippines)?

Its motto on the RH bill issue is:

YUP! to education, jobs & healthcare for all
Nope to RH bill!

You may just forward the email below to the young people in your diocese. Please ask them to help us spread it. We need 100,000 likes in FACEBOOK to show the congressmen that we are much more than those who are pushing the RH bill.

Please feel free to forward this to as many people as possible.

Thanks,
YUP!

---------- Forwarded message ----------

Hello everyone,

Here's more for our campaign to oppose the RH bill.

We made a youth coalition called YUP! or Youth United for the Philippines, which will be launched on Sep 28 at UA&P. It will be a youth rally with special guests including Christine Jacob-Sandejas and Chris Tiu.

Our motto on the RH bill issue is:
YUP! to education, jobs & healthcare for all
Nope to RH bill!

Please "Like" http://facebook.com/weareyup.

And below are tips on how to promote YUP! in the social media world. We're aiming to get as many young people as possible -- though the not-so-young are always welcome. :)

Thank you very much for the support!

==

Let's do this:

1. Change our profile pics to the icon attached
2. Share the YUP! page on our personal FB pages
3. Use the hashtag #yup when tweeting
4. Email friends and mailing lists about the page
5. Post link to FB pages of pro-life groups
6. Tell your online communities (e.g. FB groups) about the YUP! page
7. Tell friends to do the same ^^

Here's a suggested line: "YUP! I'm part of Youth United for the Philippines (and LIFE!)" Join our fanpage and invite all your friends to do the same! :)
Youth United for the Philippines (YUP!)YUP! is a coalition of youth groups that advocate real long-term progress for the Philippines. We be

Monday, September 19, 2011

Updates

RH bill sponsors questioned on birth control supplies as “essential medicines”

MANILA, September 14, 2011–If contraceptives are only meant for birth control, then why are they tagged as “essential medicines” under the RH bill?

Senate President Juan Ponce-Enrile asked this and other questions as the Senate resumed the period of interpellation for the controversial “reproductive health” (RH) bill Tuesday.

Enrile cited Section 9 of Senate Bill No. 2865 titled “An Act Providing for a National Policy on Reproductive Health and Population and Development,” which orders the inclusion of hormonal contraceptives, intrauterine devices, injectables, and “other safe, legal and effective family planning products and supplies” in the National Drug Formulary.

“These products and supplies shall also be included in the regular purchase of essential medicines and supplies of all national and local hospitals, provincial, city, and municipal health offices, including rural health units,” the Senate version of the RH bill states.


Full story

Well-Funded Pro-Abortion Forces vs. the Pro-Life Philippines

— Posted by John (September 14, 2011 at 12:12 pm)
Philippine flagFor many years, pro-abortion advocates in the Western world have tried, and failed, to get the Philippines to pass the so-called Reproductive Health (RH) bill.

If passed, the RH bill would, among other things, massively expand the presence of contraception and force medical professionals and businesses to provide them in spite of any conscientious objections. In this largely Catholic country, that hasn’t gone over well, and that’s why Filipinos continue to overwhelmingly oppose it.

Full story


US pro-lifer urges Filipinos to value family, faith

MANILA, September 13, 2011 – “Even those of us in the supposedly ‘developed’ world are happier if we have intact families with all of the children with whom we are blessed, and if we keep faith and family and community close to our hearts,” said Stephen Phelan, Communications Director of Human Life International (HLI), the world’s largest international pro-life organization.

“If Filipinos want to be happy and not just more ‘accepted’ by people who think there are too many Filipinos for their comfort, then they will continue to value faith, life and family,” he added.

“They will embrace authentic human development programs that lead toward independence – not more dependence on foreign dollars.”


Recent revelations

Phelan was referring to recent news reports that had even reached international media about billions of dollars being poured into the Philippines for the implementation of family planning programs.

Full story





RH bill about population control, not health–Enrile

By

3:13 am | Monday, September 12th, 2011
 7 share408  394

Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile has warned that proponents of the reproductive health (RH) bill have “cleverly” packaged it as a health measure when it is clearly about population control.

“RH is a deception. They are calling it a health bill when health should discuss sickness and medicines.  What is the therapeutic or medicinal value of a condom?  Or that of a birth control pill, an intrauterine device or an injectible (contraceptive),” Enrile said in an interview.

Enrile also wondered why these were the terminology being used although what was being discussed was a health bill.

“I think the real purpose is to control the country’s population through birth control that’s why they (proponents) are advocating this in the guise of a health bill,” he said.

Full story


U.S. Pro-Lifers Blast Western Depopulation Agenda in Philippines and Developing World

September 12, 2011Posted in: Abortion, Asia, Contraception, Population Control
Share In an article that appeared Sunday on the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) for Life website, two U.S. based pro-life advocates blasted wealthy Western governments for forcing an anti-life population control agenda upon the Philippines and the developing world. “The [reproductive health] promoters do whatever they have...
In an article that appeared Sunday on the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) for Life website, two U.S. based pro-life advocates blasted wealthy Western governments for forcing an anti-life population control agenda upon the Philippines and the developing world.

“The [reproductive health] promoters do whatever they have to do to get these things passed — they spend their money in promotion, in getting journalists on their side, opening clinics to circumvent pro-life laws, wooing politicians who value their own power more than they do the families and culture of the nation they represent,” said Stephen Phelan, Communications Manager for Human Life International. “If they can’t get what they want — which is free-of-charge and full access to contraception and abortion — passed democratically, they will use the courts or other non-democratic means to get what they want.”

Full story



Sotto to pro-RH: Bulaga! I went to Harvard

By

4:25 am | Sunday, September 11th, 2011
 14 share242  226

His prolife opinions may not be to the liking of certain parties, but Senate Majority Leader Vicente Sotto III declares he’s no “iskul-bukol” when it comes to the issue of reproductive health.

Sotto on Saturday cried foul over personal attacks against him over his vigorous campaign against the approval of Senate Bill No. 2865, which seeks to establish a national reproductive health framework and allow wider access to contraceptives.

Sotto, a 12-year Senate veteran, has been ridiculed by supporters of the RH bill, particularly in social media. He has been portrayed as being intellectually challenged, largely because of his occasional hosting job at the popular “Eat Bulaga” noontime variety and entertainment show and his background as a comedian and musician.

“It’s because they only know me from ‘Iskul Bukol,’” he said, referring to the popular TV 1980s sitcom featuring a bunch of mischievous, overaged and underachieving schoolboys played by Sotto, his younger brother Vic Sotto and Joey de Leon.

Full story



U.S. Govt. Largest Population Control Promoter in Philippines

by Adam Cassandra | Manilla, Philippines | LifeNews.com | 9/9/11 10:08 AM
International
  •  165
  • Share
A diplomatic cable recently published by the controversial website Wikileaks confirms the depth of support by the U.S. government for population control initiatives in the Philippines over the past 40 years, including support for the highly contested Reproductive Health (RH) Bill currently under consideration in the Philippine legislature.

“Landmark appropriations and draft legislation reflect increasing commitment within the Philippine Government to further expand and sustain programs started forty years ago with U.S. Government’s assistance through USAID,” former U.S. Ambassador to the Philippines Kristie Kenny said in the cable. “The U.S. Government continues to be the largest donor in the Philippine population sector supporting efforts to improve local government service delivery and increase private sector contributions to family health outcomes.”

Full story



Abortion stats based on inflated hospital records

MANILA, September 7, 2011–One of the Senate sponsors of the controversial “reproductive health” (RH) bill admitted Tuesday that statistics being used by pro-RH advocates are merely “extrapolations” and are therefore not exact.

Tuesday’s floor debates brought into the open how pro-RH lobbyists have been calculating the supposed number of abortions in the country, which Sen. Miriam Defensor-Santiago claims is at 570,000 annually.
Under interpellation by Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile, Santiago — a sponsor of the RH bill — revealed that the figure came from 2008 extrapolations by the Guttmacher Institute and the UP Population Institute. The New York-based Guttmacher Institute is the former research arm of the pro-abortion group Planned Parenthood, the largest provider of abortion services in the US.

Full story


Sotto reveals P26-M lobby funds for RH bill

06-Sep-11, 6:39 AM | Karl John C. Reyes, InterAksyon.com

MANILA, Philippines - Senate Majority Leader Vicente Sotto III revealed Monday that $617,000 (about P26 million) in lobby funds were being used by foreign organizations to fund local organizations campaigning for the enactment of the Reproductive Health (RH) bill now pending before Congress.

In an interview before the start of session Monday afternoon, Sotto said that the Family Planning Organization of the Philippines (FPOP) received a total amount of $617,000 in 2010 to fund activities and campaign for the passage of RH bill.

“It ($617,000) was released to FPOP in 2010, from International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF),” Sotto said.


Full story


visit this site www.alfi.org.ph

Saturday, September 17, 2011

http://www.philstar.com/images/philstar-logo-white.JPG

Opinion
No photo
Will US imperialism return with a vengeance?

SHOOTING STRAIGHT By Bobit S. Avila
(The Philippine Star) Updated September 15, 2011 12:00 AM

During the Miss Universe Pageant in Sao Paolo, Brazil, Miss Angola won the title, while our very own Shamcey Supsup bagged 3rd place. When asked a tough question on love, she replied, “If I had to change my religious beliefs, I would not marry the person that I love because the first person that I love is God who created me. And I have my faith, my principles and this is what made me who I am. And if that person loves me, she should love my God!” Wow! That’s a great answer compared to Venus Raj’s “Major, major!” The CBCP should make her our poster girl for our anti-RH campaign!
Speaking of the RH Bill, I read the March 7, 1970 speech of former Rep. Romulo B. Lumauig of Manila entitled “The New Colonialist” and somehow this article reminded me of how much influence America had in our country back in those days, and the presence of US military bases in Clark Air Base and Subic Naval Base were the symbols of America’s stranglehold on our country. It was this reason why our homegrown Communist insurgency with their allied front organizations constantly marched in our streets fighting against American imperialism.
But on that fateful day of Sept. 16, 1991, 12 Philippine Senators, notably, Senate President Jovito Salonga. Juan Ponce Enrile, Agapito “Butz” Aquino, Joseph Estrada, Teofisto Guingona Jr., Sotero Laurel, Orlando Mercado, Ernesto Maceda, Aquilino Pimentel Jr., Victor Ziga, Rene Saguisag and Wigberto Tañada (who authored Resolution No. 1259 of Non-Concurrence to “A Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation and Security”) voted to approve the Tañada resolution, thus rejecting the proposed treaty that would have extended the presence of the US military bases in the country.
I wrote articles against those Senators, as I really wanted the US military bases to stay because of the huge amount of money that the US then poured into our country to operate these bases. I submit that while it gave a lot of jobs in Clark and Subic, it also allowed prostitution to flourish in Clark and Subic. But the Senators were adamant and at the risk of an economic fallout, they rejected the treaty and the US bases became history.
When the 12 Senators threw out the last vestiges of US imperialism from our shores, one would think that the Philippines had finally cut its umbilical cord with America and in a way, this has happened to us. If today the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) has been considerably weakened as compared to those times when the US military bases were here, it was due to the fact that the presence of the US bases was a great boon to our military. Indeed, old PAF pilots would tell me that when they landed in Clark, they could get fuel for their planes courtesy of the USA. That’s how it was then.
Today, the AFP has to contend with a miniscule military aid from the United States government who are still sore at us for kicking out (if we didn’t kick them out, Mt. Pinatubo would have done it anyway) their US military bases. Incidentally, I was in Clark last year and toured Angeles City that night and the honky-tonk bars or the sex trade were still very much in business. But because the 12 Senators booted out the US military bases, the Communists ran out of reasons to march in the streets against US imperialism.
A couple of weeks ago the controversial WikiLeaks issue finally entered the Philippine area of responsibility... where cables from the US government to and from the Philippines were exposed in what I would call “Wiki-Tsismis”. Despite Sen. Pia Cayetano’s insistence that the Reproductive Health (RH) Bill will not lead to abortion, Wiki-Tsismis apparently confirms the role of the US government in promoting population control initiatives in the Philippines, through USAID. Perhaps Sen. Cayetano is pretending not to know that almost all contraceptive drugs are abortifacient.
One of these cables apparently revealed that then US Ambassador Kristie Kenney said, “The US Government continues to be the largest donor in the Philippine population sector supporting efforts to improve local government service delivery and increase private sector contributions to family health outcomes.” This cable was sent from Manila to Washington D.C. in July 2008 during the intense debate in the Philippine legislature about state funding for contraceptives and family planning services.
When US State Department Secretary Hillary Clinton came for a visit, she made it clear that the Philippines should pass an RH bill. Now wasn’t that “pressuring” the Philippine Legislature, especially the Senate to follow the “orders” of the United States? Sec. Clinton probably thought that the Philippines is still a colony of the United States... or perhaps she maybe right... that we are still a colony of the United States. So we ask our Senators, notably Sen. Pia Cayetano and Sen. Miriam Defensor Santiago... will they be the instruments for the return of American imperialism to the Philippines? The ball is now in the court of the Senate and our pro-RH Senators!
* * *
For email responses to this article, write to vsbobita@mozcom.com or vsbobita@gmail.com.
His columns can be accessed through http://www.philstar.com
During the Miss Universe Pageant in Sao Paolo, Brazil, Miss Angola won the title, while our very own Shamcey Supsup bagged 3rd place. When asked a tough question on love, she replied, “If I had to change my religious beliefs, I would not marry the person that I love because the first person that I love is God who created me. And I have my faith, my principles and this is what made me who I am. And if that person loves me, she should love my God!” Wow! That’s a great answer compared to Venus Raj’s “Major, major!” The CBCP should make her our poster girl for our anti-RH campaign!
Speaking of the RH Bill, I read the March 7, 1970 speech of former Rep. Romulo B. Lumauig of Manila entitled “The New Colonialist” and somehow this article reminded me of how much influence America had in our country back in those days, and the presence of US military bases in Clark Air Base and Subic Naval Base were the symbols of America’s stranglehold on our country. It was this reason why our homegrown Communist insurgency with their allied front organizations constantly marched in our streets fighting against American imperialism.
But on that fateful day of Sept. 16, 1991, 12 Philippine Senators, notably, Senate President Jovito Salonga. Juan Ponce Enrile, Agapito “Butz” Aquino, Joseph Estrada, Teofisto Guingona Jr., Sotero Laurel, Orlando Mercado, Ernesto Maceda, Aquilino Pimentel Jr., Victor Ziga, Rene Saguisag and Wigberto Tañada (who authored Resolution No. 1259 of Non-Concurrence to “A Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation and Security”) voted to approve the Tañada resolution, thus rejecting the proposed treaty that would have extended the presence of the US military bases in the country.
I wrote articles against those Senators, as I really wanted the US military bases to stay because of the huge amount of money that the US then poured into our country to operate these bases. I submit that while it gave a lot of jobs in Clark and Subic, it also allowed prostitution to flourish in Clark and Subic. But the Senators were adamant and at the risk of an economic fallout, they rejected the treaty and the US bases became history.
When the 12 Senators threw out the last vestiges of US imperialism from our shores, one would think that the Philippines had finally cut its umbilical cord with America and in a way, this has happened to us. If today the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) has been considerably weakened as compared to those times when the US military bases were here, it was due to the fact that the presence of the US bases was a great boon to our military. Indeed, old PAF pilots would tell me that when they landed in Clark, they could get fuel for their planes courtesy of the USA. That’s how it was then.
Today, the AFP has to contend with a miniscule military aid from the United States government who are still sore at us for kicking out (if we didn’t kick them out, Mt. Pinatubo would have done it anyway) their US military bases. Incidentally, I was in Clark last year and toured Angeles City that night and the honky-tonk bars or the sex trade were still very much in business. But because the 12 Senators booted out the US military bases, the Communists ran out of reasons to march in the streets against US imperialism.
A couple of weeks ago the controversial WikiLeaks issue finally entered the Philippine area of responsibility... where cables from the US government to and from the Philippines were exposed in what I would call “Wiki-Tsismis”. Despite Sen. Pia Cayetano’s insistence that the Reproductive Health (RH) Bill will not lead to abortion, Wiki-Tsismis apparently confirms the role of the US government in promoting population control initiatives in the Philippines, through USAID. Perhaps Sen. Cayetano is pretending not to know that almost all contraceptive drugs are abortifacient.
One of these cables apparently revealed that then US Ambassador Kristie Kenney said, “The US Government continues to be the largest donor in the Philippine population sector supporting efforts to improve local government service delivery and increase private sector contributions to family health outcomes.” This cable was sent from Manila to Washington D.C. in July 2008 during the intense debate in the Philippine legislature about state funding for contraceptives and family planning services.
When US State Department Secretary Hillary Clinton came for a visit, she made it clear that the Philippines should pass an RH bill. Now wasn’t that “pressuring” the Philippine Legislature, especially the Senate to follow the “orders” of the United States? Sec. Clinton probably thought that the Philippines is still a colony of the United States... or perhaps she maybe right... that we are still a colony of the United States. So we ask our Senators, notably Sen. Pia Cayetano and Sen. Miriam Defensor Santiago... will they be the instruments for the return of American imperialism to the Philippines? The ball is now in the court of the Senate and our pro-RH Senators!
* * *
For email responses to this article, write to vsbobita@mozcom.com or vsbobita@gmail.com.
His columns can be accessed through http://www.philstar.com

Saturday, July 23, 2011

ABS - CBN affront against the Church

While reading your email message, Bro.Ed,  I received the following text message passed on by a friend and supposedly from a Fr. B.A. Ong:

"D show XXX of Abs Cbn aired an exhibit in CCP Pasay. An image of Jesus Christ... sacrilegiously vulgarized.  A certain MEDIO CRUZ, a devil atheist artist did this.  CCP management with head appointed by PNoy allowed this to be shown.  We are catholics.  Please pray for forgiveness of this most blasphemous act.  Please pass so others may know this kind of devil now exists in our society."



On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Ed Tirona <ejttirona@gmail.com> wrote:
ANOTHER ABS-CBN AFFRONT AGAINST THE CHURCH!

In the 6:30 pm ABS-CBN Radyo Patrol news tonight (July 22) they featured a supposed artist (missed the name of the bloke who looks more like a gender aberrant) who took the liberty of scandalizing the image of Christ by disfiguring its face and sacrilegiously vulgarizing it with obscenities ostensibly as an art expression. This is another affront to us Catholics coming in the wake of this station leading in church bashing with their invented "Pajero" tag which they feasted on in ridiculing our Bishops for two weeks. Has ABS-CBN given up its sense of decency in being a leading butcher of this administration against the Catholic Church? (would Maria Ressa allow such a despicable act if she were still with this station)?

I call upon the militant Church organizations to denounce this obvious attempt of ABS-CBN to discredit our Church and what we Catholics believe in. Let us denounce this station for its total lack of sensitivity and professionalism. I wonder if the ABS-CBN management will have the guts to do the same to the Muslims. The lay faithful must not allow ABS-CBN to get away with malicious reporting against the Catholic faith!

- Bro. Ed Tirona, Council of the Laity of the Philippines

Friday, July 15, 2011

Statement of Bishops Before The Blue Ribbon Committee


Honorable Members of the Senate:

We thank this august body for inviting us to shed light on an issue that has deeply saddened not only the seven of us but all the Catholic faithful. We hope that our presence will aid your work of legislation. We shall reply with great respect to your questions as far as the facts enable us.

We are from provinces that have some of the most difficult areas that we as Bishops have to reach. Most of us are from calamity or conflict-stricken areas. We serve communities some of which are the poorest of the poor. Our vocation is to help them in so far as we can with our resources. When we lack resources, we seek the assistance of others, especially from those whose mandate is to provide assistance, particularly in health services and in charity. Some of us received service vehicles from PCSO that are heavy duty 4 x 4 pick-ups in order for our social, health, and charitable services to reach remote areas. Others received vehicles that have multiple purposes of bringing indigent sick people to hospitals or distribute food, medicines, and clothing to calamity stricken families.

We are very grateful for the help extended to us. We still believe that we have not violated any law, or even the Constitution. We express our sadness that our sincere desire to help people and receive necessary assistance for doing so has confused, disturbed and even scandalized many of the Catholic faithful. As our pastoral statement has said, we honestly “failed to consider the pitfalls to which these grants could possibly lead.” We also express our “readiness to do everything that is necessary to heal this wound so that we can all move forward in hope.”

For this reason, regardless of whether the acquisition of the vehicles has been lawful or unlawful, constitutional or unconstitutional, we are returning the vehicles. The vehicles in Mindanao are ready for immediate turnover to a duly authorized PCSO official. The vehicles in Luzon are right now outside the Senate for immediate turnover to PCSO officials.

Again, we thank Your Honors for this opportunity to voice our sentiments on this matter.

Thank you and God bless you.

Archbishop Orlando Quevedo, O.M.I.
Bishop Rodolfo Beltran
Archbishop Ernesto Salgado
Bishop Leopoldo Jaucian, SVD
Archbishop Romulo Valles Bishop Juan de Dios Pueblos

July 13, 2011

Thursday, June 23, 2011

RH BILL - IBASURA


Three online surveys are in favor of IBASURA.  But the FaceBook survey is not.  Please click the link below and vote IBASURA.  Please ask friends also to vote. 

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

‘Europe is dying’ U.S. population expert tells Senate hearing

by Thaddeus Baklinski
  • Tue Jun 21, 2011 13:50 EST


Population Research Institute (PRI) President Steven Mosher

WASHINGTON DC, June 21, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Given the precipitous decline in the birthrates of European countries, all anti-natal programs funded by the United States should immediately be replaced by pro-natal programs, one top population expert recently told the U.S. Senate.

“It doesn’t matter whether we call them reproductive health programs, family planning programs, or population control programs,” said Stephen Mosher, president of the Population Research Institute (PRI). “They all have the same effect: they force down the birth rate in countries that are already dying. Such programs are only making a bad problem worse.”

The hearing before the Senate Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe focused on the implications for the security, as well as the economic and social developments in Europe, due to demographic decline marked by diminishing and rapidly aging populations, in most of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe’s (OSCE) 56 participating states.

Commission Chairman, Rep. Chris Smith noted that the member states - every country of Europe and the former Soviet Union, as well as the U.S. and Canada - are already seeing dramatic demographic changes that are “sure to have dramatic consequences for the security, economic, and human dimensions of the OSCE.”

“The fact is that most OSCE countries are in demographic decline, many of them in rapid decline. Only a handful of the OSCE’s 56 member states are at or above replacement level,” Smith observed.
Mosher agreed. “Five centuries after the Black Plague devastated Europe, a White Pestilence is now decimating that same continent,” he said. “Many nations, especially in Europe, are already in a death spiral, losing a significant number of people each year. Listen closely, and you will hear the muffled sound of populations crashing.”

The commission heard that the pattern of demographic decline will likely have significant social, economic and security consequences for countries throughout the region. States will become increasingly dependent upon foreign workers in the coming decades, while there will be a dramatic decrease in the pool of potential recruits for military service, resulting in mounting social tensions “as demonstrated by clashes in some participating States in recent years,” according to Smith.

“It is alarming and sad to see xenophobic and ultranationalist violence fueled by one nation’s perceptions of long-term decline vis-a-vis another group,” Smith said.

“Likewise with the economy,” Smith continued. “It is far from clear how, in many of the most rapidly declining countries, how economic growth can be sustained by a declining population - or, to touch on the most pressing specific, how the numerically smaller younger generations will even begin to provide for the larger older generations.”

Steven Mosher, whose presentation to the Commission concluded that the downward spiral of fertility decline and resulting demographic collapse is almost beyond reversal, began his address with a quote from ancient Greece:
“One remarks nowadays all over Greece such a diminution in natality and in general manner such depopulation that the towns are deserted and the fields lie fallow. Although this country has not been ravaged by wars or epidemics, the cause of the harm is evident: by avarice or cowardice the people, if they marry, will not bring up the children they ought to have. At most they bring up one or two. It is in this way that the scourge before it is noticed is rapidly developed. The remedy is in ourselves; we have but to change our morals.” (Polybius, 204-122 B.C.)
A transcript of the Commission hearing titled, “2050: Implications of Demographic Trends in the OSCE Region” is available here.

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Urgent Need for Prayers for the Safety of the Holy Father

Pray for the safety of the Pope

Security was considerably increased in the Vatican yesterday after direct threats against the Holy Father were made in a recently-released video by a member of an extreme Islamist group. The Pope and the Italian Prime Minister were called "easy  targets" in the video. [Source: various Italian agencies, including AGI.]

Let us pray for the Holy Father.
Posted by New Catholic at 6/13/2011 03:59:00 AM 
 

Tuesday, June 14, 2011

Rommel Lopez 10:35am Jun 13
From my staff who saw the Harapan last night:

I'm not a devout Catholic. I rarely go to church. I almost never read the bible.  But I know the concept of responsibility.

When you fail to go to a job interview, expect to lose a chance to get the job.

When you neglect your health, expect to be sick. When you fail to keep a promise, expect to lose relations.

The consequence may be harsh but that's life's best teacher. I'm afraid that in the future, in this country, married men will be fearless engaging in sex with other women because they know how to prevent a baby from forming. Couples will try beating and nagging each other out to have a good chance for divorce to be granted. Mistresses will have the last laugh for they will soon have an equal, if not more, power over the first wife. I'm afraid that responsibility will not anymore be valued, and noble men will diminish. People will be encouraged to only seek the easiest way out & only do things for fun (commonly misinterpreted as happiness).
Congressmen claim: battered women need divorce. Wouldn't that just let crazy guys loose, marry someone else whom they'll abuse too? Wouldn't that deprive the domestic victim the only power she has over the man who has maltreated her? What if that's his way to force her to divorce him?

Why not create a law which will prevent abusers from marrying instead? Are we really advocating women's rights or mistresses' rights? I'm don't have anything against children outside of first marriage---they are victims too. But an individual hopping from one person to another, leading to the creation of more motherless/fatherless children should be disciplined too.

Why deprive children of their childhood by opening to them, at an immature age, what contraceptive does? Because it is more convenient than to create a law that will prohibit people from poisoning their minds?

Why steal a child's innocence? Would that make our country first world? It's sad that we cannot think of a better way to improve our lives & forget that humans too are resources.

I personally know people who had gotten pregnant, unplanned. Some were even left by guys who did it with them. Yet, they decided to keep the child, and they never regretted that decision. They even became more responsible.

I personally know couples who fell apart because of third parties but reconciled. Good thing, there is no divorce here... yet. They stayed true to their promise.
Are we too desperate to be a first world country? Are we too frustrated to end marriage? Why have sex and marry, in the first place? Because it feels good?

Because we are happy for the moment?

Have we forgotten that responsibility is a big step toward social and economic development? Or are we just saying, we are ready to break vows?

Eliminate responsibility, and then what? We'll eliminate love and be anti-social too? Create websites such as that of the students of the University of Chicago, where students fish strangers online to have casual sex? "What ever happened to getting-to-know each other?" commented a host of The Today Show.

If it's true that eliminating responsibility and humanity is the only way to make life better, then I believe that the quality of life is not going anywhere but downwards.
View Post on Facebook · Edit Email Settings · Reply to this email to add a comment.



--


"I shall pass this way but ONCE.
Any Goodness I can DO; Any Kindness I can SHOW
Let me do it NOW.  For I shall Never Pass this way,.. AGAIN.
"

Thursday, June 9, 2011

The Spendor of the Church Blog

Why Contraception
Leads To Abortion
Bernardo M. Villegas

          Some well meaning individuals support the RH Bill because they contend that a more widespread availability of contraceptives will reduce illegal abortions in the Philippines.  They sincerely bewail the thousands of illegal abortions being performed yearly in the Philippines and they are of the opinion that making pills, condoms and other contraceptive devices more freely available, especially to the poor, will actually reduce these illegal abortions.
          Such an opinion is based on pure speculation that is not based on empirical science.  On the other hand, there is abundant research in countries where contraceptive devices are freely available in vending machines or the corner drug store demonstrating that abortions tend to increase with the widespread use of contraception.  I have lived in two countries where contraception has been practiced for decades – the United States and Spain – where hundreds of thousands of babies are being aborted every year.  Even prescinding from the medical fact that some so-called contraceptives (e.g. the “morning after pill” and the IUD) do not prevent fertilization but kill the human life before implantation, the RH Bill should not be passed because it will encourage the widespread use of artificial contraceptives, which in turn will increase abortions.
          Some of our economists who favor the RH Bill are still too enamored with the sterile tool of econometrics. They subject economic data to purely mathematical and statistical analysis without having recourse to the behavioral sciences that can capture more completely the very complex reality that the human being is.  It is no surprise that a good number of “economists” who have been awarded the Nobel Prize in Economics in the last decade or so come from other social sciences or make full use of the findings of such disciplines as social psychology, sociology, philosophy, anthropology, etc.  One such Nobel laureate is George Arthur Akerlof of the University of California (Berkeley).   In 2001, Akerlof shared the Nobel Prize in Economics with
Michael Spence and Joseph Stiglitz.
          From the psycho-sociological studies of Akerlof, we find strong empirical evidence that the widespread use of contraception has increased the rates of divorce, abortion, single motherhood and psychologically disturbed children – which are not only social ills but can lead to significant increases in public spending to address the consequent social problems.  Akerlof described a phenomenon that he labeled “reproductive technology shock.”  He demonstrated through empirical studies in the U.S. that new technologies that had helped to spawn the late 20th Century sexual revolution – modern contraceptive devices and legal abortion – had not only failed to suppress the incidence of out-of-wedlock child bearing but also had actively worked to increase it.
          How can we explain the “reproductive technology shock” from the viewpoint of behavioral science?  For women who had not been using contraceptives, these technologies had transformed the old paradigm of socio-sexual assumptions, expectations, and behaviors in ways that were especially disadvantageous.  For example, the availability of legal abortion now allowed men to view their offspring as the deliberate product of female choice rather than the chance product of sexual intercourse.  Thus it encouraged biological fathers to reject not only any supposed obligation to marry the mother but also the very idea of paternal obligation.  Behavioral changes like these are what are completely ignored by those advocating the RH Bill.  They only focus on the short-run problem of reducing illegal abortions or the number of mothers dying at child birth.
          Even their assumptions about the short-term benefits of making contraceptives available to the poor can be questioned for lack of empirical evidence.  I have seen no studies showing that those who procure illegal abortions would have not become pregnant if they had access to contraceptives.  As demonstrated in numerous studies in other countries, those who are frequent users of contraceptives are the ones most prone to having abortions.  The explanation given here is that contraceptive users tend to take more risks in instant gratification, either with the same partner or multiple partners.  The social norm of avoiding pre-marital sex is more easily discarded when contraceptives are widely available.  This transformation of behavior is explained by Akerlof's theory about “social identity.”  He and co-author Rachel Kranton argued that individuals do not have preferences only over different goods and services.  They also adhere to social norms for how different people should behave.  The widespread use of contraceptives and the introduction of legal abortion in the United States changed the social norms which kept abortions at a low level in the past.  I am against the RH Bill because I take very seriously the findings of behavioral sciences.  The proponents of the RH Bill show an abysmal ignorance of these findings.
          Another assumption being made by those who favor the RH Bill is that maternal mortality would decline with greater access of the poor to contraceptives.  Once again, I find no empirical backing of this heroic assumption.  I still have to be presented studies which prove that mothers who die while giving birth did not want to be pregnant and would have avoided pregnancy if they had been given access to artificial contraceptives.  Obviously, none of these mothers could have been interviewed after death.  It is very possible that these unfortunate women wanted very much to be mothers.  The solution, therefore, is not to increase access to contraceptives but to do everything possible to put up more maternity clinics and to make midwives available even in the most remote regions of the country.  It is beyond me why there is an obsession to reduce maternal mortality by preventing women to be mothers.
          Advocates of the RH Bill will reply to these objections by saying that some local surveys show that there are many mothers among poor households who have had unwanted pregnancies.  With all due respect to these   survey companies and the groups financing such surveys, I find both the methods and contents of these surveys highly questionable from the scientific point of view.  The questions are formulated to elicit the desired answers, very much like polls predicting the results of elections that are financed by the candidates themselves.  These surveys on family planning are frequently funded by inter-national organizations (especially from the U.S.) that have a distinct bias in
favor of birth control.  More objective studies by economists abroad (like Lant Princhett of Harvard University) have scientifically demonstrated that mothers have the number of children that they desire.  The concept of “unwanted pregnancy” is highly suspect except in extreme cases of rape and incest.
          Finally, to the objection that all the scientific studies I have cited only permit a rational person to talk about probabilities, i.e. contraception “may” increase the rate of abortion, I answer that all legislation is about probability.  Speed limits are imposed because driving beyond these limits “may” lead to accidents.  Monopolies are prohibited because monopolists “may” use their power to abuse consumers.  Cigarette manufacturers are obliged to put a warning on their labels because cigarette smoking “may” be dangerous to your health.  For an analogous reason, any rational person will object to a law promoting the use  of artificial contraceptives among the masses because contraception may increase the rate of abortion, marriage breakups,  single motherhood, and psychologically troubled teenagers and all the consequent economic and social costs to Philippine society. 
          For comments, my email address is bvillegas@uap.edu.ph.

Friday, June 3, 2011

Vote 'NO' on Philstar online Poll on RH

Hello,

The Philippine Star online poll on the RH bill is still ongoing.

Just click the link below and vote "NO" in the appropriate poll. It takes less than a minute.

You can only vote once. Please ask family and friends to vote too.

Thank you!

Rep. Karlo Nograles interpellation on HB 4244

Here is an unofficial transcript of the knockout delivered by Rep. Karlo Nograles
(1st District, Davao)
yesterday during the period of interpellation on HB 4244.

It was a well-executed set-up.  RH Bill co-author Rep. Kaka Bag-ao (Akbayan
Party List) ended up backpedalling
on side effects acknowledged by the birth
control pill manufacturers themselves. 

http://www.congress.gov.ph/members/images/15th/bagao-a.jpg
Bag-ao had no idea what hit her, leaving her fellow RH Bill co-authors stunned.

Read all about it.  But do not by any means assume that we have won the bout.
We just won another round.  That's all.

TRUTH WILL OUT!

Z



EXCERPTS FROM
UNOFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT OF
PERIOD OF INTERPELLATION
ON HOUSE BILL No. 4244


01 June 2011


Rep. Fariñas presiding
Rep. Bag-Ao sponsoring
Rep. Nograles interpellating


EXCERPTS FROM UNOFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT OF PERIOD OF INTERPELLATION ON HOUSE BILL No. 4244 – 01 JUNE 2011

THE PRESIDING OFFICER (Rep. Fariñas). ... for
continuation of sponsorship and the Honorable Nograles for
his interpellation.

REP. NOGRALES. Good afternoon, Mr. Speaker, dear
colleagues.

Mr. Speaker, I would like to ask if the distinguished Sponsor
is willing to answer several questions from this
Representation.

REP. BAG-AO. Gladly, Mr. Speaker.

REP. NOGRALES. Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.

Let me first go to Section 2 of the proposed bill. Under
Section 2, it states very clearly that, “The state likewise
guarantees universal access to medically safe, legal,
affordable, effective and quality reproductive health care
services, methods, devices, supplies and relevant information
and education thereon even as it prioritizes the needs of
women and children, among other underprivileged sectors.”

Mr. Speaker, I’d like to ask, does this includes state
guaranteed access to birth control pills or oral contraceptives?

REP. BAG-AO. Yes, Mr. Speaker. In fact, I invite the
Honorable Congressman from Davao to look at Section 10 of
the bill, House Bill No. 4244, which says that;

“Family Planning Supplies as Essential Medicines. –
Products and supplies for modern family planning methods
shall be part of the National Drug Formulary and the same
shall be included in the regular purchase of essential
medicines and supplies of all national and local hospitals and
other government health units.”

Also there is a provision on Section 11 on the Procurement
and Distribution of Family Planning Supplies, which says
that;

“The DOH shall spearhead the efficient procurement,
distribution to LGUs and usage-monitoring of family
planning supplies for the whole country. The DOH shall
coordinate with all appropriate LGUs to plan and implement
this procurement and distribution program. The supply and
the budget allotment shall be based on, among others, the
current levels and projections of the following:

(a)
number of women or reproductive age and couples who
want to space or limit their children;
(b)
contraceptive prevalence rate, by type of method used;
and
(c)
cost of family planning supplies.”
REP. NOGRALES. Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.
We will go to those provisions later on. But since the
distinguished Sponsor and the authors of the bill have agreed
that this includes birth control pills, I would like to ask, Mr.
Speaker, if the authors of this bill and the distinguished
Sponsor is very much aware of the dangers of the birth
control pill. For instance, Mr. Speaker, are the authors of the
bill aware that at the University of Udine in Italy, Department
of Biomedical Sciences and Technologies have reported in
their study in 2008, that women on the pill were four times
more likely to have high levels of C-reactive protein enough

to cause intermediate risk for heart disease. This is reported
by the University of Udine in Italy. So, therefore, four times
more chances to have high levels of C-reactive protein or
CRP that causes heart disease.

REP. BAG-AO. Marami pong salamat sa tanong. Unanguna,
po kagaya po ng napag-usapan noong ang bill na ito ay
pending pa lang sa committee, iyong tanong po na iyan ay
natalakay na at na-raise na. At babanggitin ko lang po ang
records ng committee hearing noong December 15, 2010,
noong pinag-usapan din ang tanong na iyan. At nasagot na
din po iyan ng mga eksperto natin. At sabi po ni Mr.
Misiteros, halimbawa, sabi nya, “While some would argue
that contraceptives are carcinogenic, we can always say, any
doctor can always say that almost all drugs, whether it be for
contraception or not, are carcinogenic. In fact, not just drugs
but the food we eat, the fertilizers we put on them. And it is
always when you are faced with something that you are
confronted with the question because drugs are double-edged
swords including contraception. At iyan pong tanong na iyan
ay natalakay at nasagot na.

Pangalawa, kung babasehan po natin ang documentations at
documents na ni-release ng World Health Organization,
2007, page 109, ang sabi po nila, “Almost all modern
contraceptives are in the World Health Organization’s model
list of essential medicines. Ano iyong basehan na pagkasabi
na ito ay essential medicines? Sabi nila, nilagay ito ng World
Health Organization on the basis of priority healthcare need,
efficacy, safety and cost effectiveness. In fact, naglagay sila
ng hiwalay na box para sa mga drugs na kinokonsider nilang
abortifacient.

Ang sabi lang nila, clearly marked with a box note stating,
“Where permitted under national law and where culturally
acceptable.” Kung sabihin natin na lahat ng—ang mga pills
na may kinalaman sa contraceptives ay may carcinogenic
effect at sinasabi ko nga na ito ay nasagot na ng paulit-ulit
doon sa committee hearing, ay lahat po talaga ay pwede
nating ipagbawal, ‘no? Kahit iyong sinasabi nila na
carcinogenic ang kumain ng barbecue dahil ito ay may
nasusunog at dahil niluluto sa uling, eh, ibig sabihin ay hindi
na tayo dapat kumain ng mga litsong manok kasi ito ay
carcinogenic.

Kaya—at panghuli, ang gusto ko lang i-point out, tingin ko
hindi para sa atin, kaya gusto ko rin kayong imbitahin na
wala namang enumeration ng drugs sa Section 10, Family
Planning Supplies as Essential Medicines. Kaya ang talagang
pwedeng ekspertong magtakda ng listahan kung ano ang mga
medisinang dapat ituring na abortifacient o contraceptives ay
dapat i-declare, o carcinogenic, ay dapat lamang i-declare ng
Food and Drugs Administration.

Iyong birth control pills, as well as all contraceptives, which
will be provided under the bill, are subject to the approval of
the FDA. Hindi po ito ang tamang venue para pag-usapan
kung ano ang particular na gamot ang carcinogenic o kaya ay
abortifacient. What we need is an authoritative
documentation of the contraceptives which are safe and
healthy. And as of now, we depend on the World Health
Organization list, model list of essential medicines, which


EXCERPTS FROM UNOFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT OF PERIOD OF INTERPELLATION ON HOUSE BILL No. 4244 – 01 JUNE 2011

were listed on the basis of priority healthcare need, efficacy,
safety, I repeat, safety and cost effectiveness.

REP. NOGRALES. But are we safe to assume, Mr. Speaker,
that the drugs that are being sold in the market were most
probably and is probably the same drugs, birth control pills
that we are giving to our women given by the government,
eh, sinasabi ninyo, subject to the regulation pa ng FDA. Pero
sa ngayon, etong mga pills that are readily available in the
market are the pills that we will be giving to our women.

REP. BAG-AO. Tama.

REP. NOGRALES. Correct?

REP. BAG-AO. Tama. In fact—at dahil ito, ang mga pills
na ito ay certified din ng FDA based sa kanilang pag-aaral na
safe para gamitin ng mga kababaihan. Sa ngayon, iyon ang
ating magiging basehan para sabihin kung ano iyong mga
contraceptives na dapat magiging bahagi ng list of essential
medicines na nakalagay sa Section 10 at Section 11.

REP. NOGRALES. Pero ang pagkakaiba kasi, Mr. Speaker,
is that, these drugs, if you want to take them, you take them at
your own risk. Pero iba naman ang pinag-uusapan natin kung
ang gobyerno ngayon ang bibili ng mga medicines na ito na
nakasasama sa mga katawan ng ating mga kababaihan at
ibinibigay ito ng libre. There is a big difference because if
you want to take those medicines, knowing that you have the
risk and you are willing to pay for that, that is a big difference
from government knowing all of these risks, purchasing all of
these medicines, giving it for free to all of our women, asking
them to take it so that they can control the population, and
then, eventually, these women dying because of all of these
diseases.

REP. BAG-AO. Pero mayroon po tayong government
agency, ang Food and Drug Administration, na siyang may
mandato para siguraduhin na ang ating mga gamot ay safe sa
lahat ng mamamayan, hindi man ito contraceptives o gamot
man ito para sa ibang sakit; at sa kasalukuyan, ang Philippine
Food and Drug Administration currently allows all types of
contraceptives, which is consistent with the World Health
Organization’s list of essential medicines.

REP. NOGRALES. Of course, Mr. Speaker, our
distinguished Sponsor, …

REP. ROMULO. Mr. Speaker.

THE PRESIDING OFFICER (Rep. Fariñas). Majority
Leader.

REP. ROMULO. Mr. Speaker, with the permission of the
Honorable Bag-ao and the Honorable Nograles, and all
Members present, may we be allowed to interrupt the debate
for the moment in order to welcome guests of the House of
Representatives, the parliamentarians …

THE PRESIDING OFFICER (Rep. Fariñas). The debate is
temporary suspended to …

REP. ROMULO. The parliamentarians and delegates
attending the 3rd ASEAN Inter-Parliamentary Assembly
(AIPA) Caucus

RESUMPTION OF SESSION

At 5:20 p.m., the session was resumed.

THE PRESIDING OFFICER (Rep. Fariñas). Session is
resumed.

REP. ROMULO. Mr. Speaker, I move that we resume the
period of interpellation with the Honorable Kaka Bag-ao and
the Honorable Karlo Nograles.

THE PRESIDING OFFICER (Rep. Fariñas). Please
proceed.

REP. NOGRALES. Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.

Allow me to go to another study. Is the distinguished
Sponsor aware that the British Medical Journal reported that
women using the pill is 1.9 times more likely to die from
cerebrovascular disease and 2.5 times more likely to die from
cervical cancer? That is 1.9 times higher chances of
developing cerebrovascular disease and 2.5 times higher
chances of developing cervical cancer.

REP. BAG-AO. Alam mo, pwede talaga tayo magpalitan ng
mga study. Bibigyan din kita ng ng isa. “Society of
obstetricians and gynecologists of Canada: Compared to
other reproductive tract and lifestyle factors that affect breast
cancer risk, example, one alcoholic drink per day, failure to
breastfeed, first child after 35, the increase in risk associated
with oral contraceptive is very small.”

Isa pang study. Bale pwede tayong magpalitan ng mga
studies e. J. Trussell, Contraceptive Technology, Chapter 3,
18th

Edition, “However, there is a great uncertainty regarding
the causal link, if any, between combined OC use and liver
and colorectal cancer, and recent evidence suggests no
association between current or former combined OC use and
breast cancer. Regardless, the net effect of combined pill use
on cancer is negligible.”

Ang punto ko lang, Mr. Speaker, una, lahat po ng studies na
ito ay isolated studies at wala pong consensus among medical
practitioners na mayroong direct relation, at talagang
sasabihin natin na hindi natin gagamitin ang mga pills na ito
kasi carcinogenic.

Pangalawa, kaya nga po ang mga gamot ay may
contraindication para malaman natin na hindi lahat ng gamot
ay pwede sa lahat ng populasyon. Kaya nga po mayroon
tayong Food and Drugs Administration, ang government
agency na may mandato, may expertise at nagko-conduct ng
research para alamin kung ano ang mga tamang gamot para
sa atin.

Panghuli, kung sasabihin natin na lahat ng mga gamot ay
carcinogenic, e huwag na ho tayo uminom ng gamot. Lately,
alam ko, ‘pag gumamit ng cellphone, carcinogenic. Baka
hindi na tayo dapat mag-cellphone.

Ang sinasabi ko lang, pwede talaga tayong umabot sa isang
absurd na application kapag tayo po ay maggagawa ng
assumption na ang mga basehan natin ay napakaraming
study, kaliwa’t kanan, na conflicting with each other.

Ang point ko po, ang sinasabi natin, sa ngayon, at ako po ay
naniniwala sa World Health Organization list of essential
medicine at sa Food and Drugs Administration competency,
to declare ano po ang mga gamot na makakabuti sa atin,


EXCERPTS FROM UNOFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT OF PERIOD OF INTERPELLATION ON HOUSE BILL No. 4244 – 01 JUNE 2011

whether ito po ay pang-araw-araw nating kailangan kagaya
ng paracetamol or para sa maternal health care at para sa
reproductive health and family planning.

Iyon po ang gusto sana nating i-emphasize sa batas na ito.
And in the end, ang mamimili po ay iyon pong gagamit.
Kung pong tingin niya, sa pagbasa niya ng contraindication,
sa pagkonsulta niya sa FDA, sa pagkonsulta niya sa midwife,
sa barangay health worker, na ang batas na ito ay
sumusuporta na dapat maraming skilled barangay health
worker at midwife, pagkatapos niyang mangunsulta,
pagkatapos niyang humingi ng impormasyon, pagkatapos
niyang magnilay, konsultahin ang kanyang asawa at mag-
decide siya na itong pill na ito ang tama para sa akin, itong
partikular na family health method ang tama para sa akin,
hindi ba dapat suportahan natin siya, lalo na kung siya ay
kabilang sa mahihirap na komunidad.

Kasi alam naman natin, iyong lower strata ng ating lipunan,
iyong mga mahihirap kung saan mas marami rin ang kanilang
mga anak, sila rin ay walang kakayahang magsubi ng pera
para bumili ng gamot.

Ang unang-unang pangangailangang uunahin niyang gastusin
ay pagkain. Kaya nga mahalaga na bahagi ng programa natin
ay i-inform ang bawat pamilya ano ang iba’t ibang
pamamaraan, ibigay sa kanila ang tamang information,
huwag nating itago para magkaroon sila ng kakayahan at
kapangyarihang mamili. At kapag namili na po sila, bigyan
po natin po sila ng pagkakataong mabigyan ng suporta ang
desisyon na kanilang gagawin. Iyon lang po ang ibig sabihin
ng bill na ito.

REP. NOGRALES. Iyon nga ang punto, Mr. Speaker. Kasi
gagamit po tayo ng pera ng bayan para bumili ng mga
contraceptive pills para ipamigay ng libre sa ating mga
kababaihan. Iyan po ang punto na gusto nating i-emphasize.
Why spend government money to purchase medicines that
may be hazardous to your health? Kahit na sabihin natin may
tsansa na hindi, may tsansa na meron, ang mangyayari ba
nito, Mr. Speaker, pag punta ng barangay health worker doon
sa mga kababaihan natin para ialok sila na gumamit o mag-
testing nitong contraceptive pills, hindi ba parang ang
mangyayari nito iyong parang debate naming dalawa ng ating
distinguished Sponsor? Sasabihin ng health worker, “O, itong
pill, may nagsasabi may kanser, may nagsasabi hindi rin
kanser, bahala ka na.”

REP. BAG-AO. Alam mo problema...

REP. NOGRALES. Ganoon po ba ang nafo-foresee nating
mangyayari dito?

REP. BAG-AO. Ang problema, ang sinasabi kasi natin ay
may be hazardous to your health, may be. Ni hindi tayo
eksperto para sabihin na ang “may be” na ito ay talagang
nakaka-cause ng kanser. Ang tingin ko nga, ang mas may
awtoridad para maitakda ano ba iyong mga essential
medicines sa ating bayan ay ang gobyerno, ang ahensiya ng
gobyerno, iyong Food and Drug Administration. Ngayon,
dumaan iyan sa mahabang pag-aaral, bawat pakete, sa
pagkakaalala ko, hindi man ho ako drug user, bawat pakete
nakalista contraindication, kailan ito pwedeng gamitin, ano
iyong—ibig sabihin, ito ay applicable sa bawat sakit. I am

sure nag-take ng responsibility ang ating gobyerno na ang
mga gamot na tingin nila ay carcinogenic ay hindi na po inaapprove
at hindi din pinapa-distribute. Ang punto ko lang
hindi natin pwedeng i-legislate ang ating mga “may bes” kasi
hindi tayo sigurado doon. Ang sigurado tayo ay kailangang
masuportahan ang pangangailangan ng family planning ng
mga taong kagaya halimbawa ni Aling Salve Paa ng
Valenzuela, na sinabi niya mayroon siyang 12 anak, buntis
siya sa panglabingtatlo, namatay ang apat dahil sa
kumplikasyon ng maruming tubig, mga sakit na madali
sanang gamutin. Anong sabi niya noong ininterbyu siya ng
Inquirer? “Kung alam ko lang ho ang family planning, hindi
ko sana gagawin ito, alam ko sana mag-space ng birth, alam
ko sana kailan ako dapat manganak, ilan dapat ang anak ko,
iyong kaya ko lang buhayin.” Iyon ho ang gusto nating
balikan na esensiya ng batas na ito, hindi mag-legislate ng
mga may be kasi hindi tayo sigurado pa.

REP. NOGRALES. Ang problema, Mr. Speaker, hindi
naman po may be ito dahil nakasulat nga sa kanilang mga
studies, very clear ang sinabi dito, University of Udine – 3.9
times, four times more likely to cause heart disease; British
Medical Journal – 1.9 times more likely to die from
cerebrovascular disease, 2.5 times more likely to die from
cervical cancer; University of Kent in Belgium – every 10
years of oral contraceptive use was correlated to 20-30%
increase in atherosclerotic plaque that may cause build up in
your arteries. UK’s Epidemiology Unit in Oxford, researches
from the cancer research says, 10% increased risk in cervical
cancer if the woman is taking the pill for five years or less,
sixty percent increased risk of developing cervical cancer if
the woman is taking the pill for five to nine years use, one
hundred percent greater risk if taken for at least 10 years.
These are very conclusive studies.

Ngayon, nabanggit naman ang FDA. FDA, sila ang
magsasabi ano iyong dapat, ano iyong tama, e bakit pa tayo
magle-legislate dito kung FDA naman pala ang magsasabi.
Why is there a need to provide legislation that classifies these
carcinogens as essential medicines, e kung andiyan naman
ang FDA para gawin iyan? Hindi ko naman sinasabi na ang
FDA will now classify these as essential medicines knowing
that all of these ay nakakabigay pala ng sakit sa ating mga
kababaihan e.

REP. BAG-AO. Okay, balik na naman tayo sa mga studies,
meron pa akong baon diyan...

Ito naman iyong studies ko para pantapat sa studies mo.
Puwede talaga tayong magpalitan ng studies.

Una, after more than 50 studies – ito naman iyong studies na
mayroon ako – most experts believe that pills have little, if
any, effect on the risk of developing breast cancer.

The following are excerpts of some of these studies:

The Women’s CARE study of 4,575 women with breast
cancer and 4,682 controls found no increased risk of breast
cancer among women currently using pills. Use of pills by
women with a family history of breast cancer was not
associated with an increased risk of breast cancer nor was the
initiation of pill use at a young age – Marchbanks 2002.


EXCERPTS FROM UNOFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT OF PERIOD OF INTERPELLATION ON HOUSE BILL No. 4244 – 01 JUNE 2011

However, several studies have shown that current users of
pills are slightly more likely to be diagnosed with breast
cancer, relative risk, 1.2 – Lancet 1996.

Two factors may explain this. Number one, a detection bias.
Pills users undergo more breast examinations and
mammograms, or two, promotion of an already present nidus
of cancer cells.

Ten years after discontinuing pills, women who have taken
pills in the past are at no increased risk of having breast
cancer diagnosed – collaborative group, Lancet 1996.

Breast cancer diagnosed in women currently on pills or
women who have taken pills in the past are more likely to be
localized or less likely to be metastatic – collaborative group,
Lancet 1996.

By age 55, the risk of having had breast cancer diagnosed is
the same for women who have used pills and those who have
not. The conclusion of the largest collaborative study of the
risk of breast cancer is that women with strong family history
of breast cancer do not further increase their breast cancer
risk by taking pills.

This was also the conclusion of the Nurses’ Health Study,
Lipnick 1986, Colditz 1996, and the Cancer and Steroid
Hormone Study – Murray 1989, the Centers for Disease
Control, Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study, 1983.

The overall conclusion of these studies is that, pills do not
cause breast cancer. Many years after stopping oral
contraceptive use, the main effect may be protection against
metastatic disease—Speroff and Darney 2001, collaborative
group, Lancet 1996.

Mayroon pa po pa rin ako diyan kung mayroon ka pa ring
study.

Pangalawa, hindi po natin nile-legislate na bigyan ng
kapangyarihan ang FDA kasi mayroon na siya. Ang sinasabi
lang natin, iyong products and supplies for modern family
planning method, shall be part of the national drug formulary
and the same shall be included in the regular purchase of
essential medicines and supplies of all national and local
hospitals and other government health units.

Ngayon, anong mga gamot iyon? Anong mga contraceptives
iyon? Iyon iyong mga contraceptives na approved ng Food
and Drug Administration based doon sa list of essential
medicine na ang puwedeng maging basehan ay ang World
Health Organization na tingin ko ay may credibility, may
expertise para itakda na itong mga ito ay safe at puwedeng
ilista bilang essential medicine.

REP. NOGRALES. Of course, Mr. Speaker, maaari din
pong magkamali ang ating mga government agencies. Let
me cite one fact. Before, Johnson&Johnson, a
pharmaceutical company, recalled the drug Ortho Evra birth
control patch, after lawsuits revealed definitive proof that
women on the patch were dying of stokes and blood clots
three times more frequently than the general population.
This, after the patches were distributed and used by the
women. Pagkatapos ma-distribute, ginamit ng mga
kababaihan natin, doon lang nalaman na nakaka-cause pala
ito ng blood clot and stroke.

And then, just recently, Mr. Speaker, published by
Bloomberg News, May 31, 2011. Bayer’s birth control pills
will be reviewed by regulators after some studies suggested
that they may cause more blood clots than competing
medicines. Two recent reports in the British Medical Journal
found a two-fold to three-fold greater risk of blood clots in
women taking pills like Bayer’s Yaz, the Food and Drug
Administration said in a statement. While all birth control
pills—all, mind you—all birth control pills pose a risk of
blood clots, the FDA review focuses on the hormone
drospirenone found in Bayer’s Yaz, Yasmin, Beyaz and
Safyral. The agency expects to have results later this
summer, etc., etc. The Yaz family of products generated
$1.47 billion in sales last year for Bayer or 3.3% of the
company’s revenue.

In other words, Mr. Speaker, $1.47 billion worth of Bayer’s
Yaz have been distributed, bought and used by women all
over the world including the Philippines, only to find out later
on that it can cause blood clot. In the meantime, regulators
said doctors and patients should watch for symptoms of blood
clots including leg or chest pains.

Too late the hero, Mr. Speaker. Ipinamigay na natin – worse,
if this bill had been passed earlier on and our government had
purchased so many boxes of this Yaz medicine, given it to
our women for them to use, and then suddenly only to be
recalled, kasi nga, uy, nagkamali tayo, nakakapatay pala ito.
How much more and how many more pills out there in the
market ang may ganyang klaseng findings? And medical
journals have already warned us and I think the Members of
this House should be well-informed of the risk before putting
this to a vote.

REP. BAG-AO. Tama iyan. Pero gusto ko lang ipaalala sa
iyo, pareho tayong abogado, meron tayong presumption of
regularity sa mga government agencies. Ibig sabihin, ang una
nating kaisipan ay tama, may competence at may kakayahan
ang government agency na ito. Ngayon, kung lahat ng gamot
na-re-release ng Food and Drug Administration ay
pagdududahan natin na hindi tama sa atin, ay talagang gusto
nating – sina-suggest mo ba na huwag tayong magtiwala sa
ating gobyerno?

REP. NOGRALES. Ang sina-suggest ko huwag po tayong
bumili ng birth control pills.

REP. BAG-AO. Huwag tayong magtiwala sa Food and
Drug Administration? Na halimbawa ang sasabihin ng FDA
na ito ay bahagi ng list of essential medicines.

REP. NOGRALES. Huwag nating gamitin ang pera ng
taumbayan para bumili ng birth control pills.

THE PRESIDING OFFICER (Rep. Fariñas). Hold it, hold
it, hold it, hold it. Please speak one after the other and
address all your answers to the Chair.

REP. BAG-AO. Mr. Speaker.

THE PRESIDING OFFICER (Rep. Fariñas). Please
proceed.

REP. BAG-AO. Mr. Speaker, ang pinupunto ko lang po,
unang-una ay mayroon pong presumption of regularity.


EXCERPTS FROM UNOFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT OF PERIOD OF INTERPELLATION ON HOUSE BILL No. 4244 – 01 JUNE 2011

REP. CAGAS. Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker.

THE PRESIDING OFFICER (Rep. Fariñas). The
Gentleman from Davao del Sur.

REP. CAGAS. Yes. I just want to ask the two distinguished
Congressman and Congresswoman, in what language is the
title of the bill written? Was it written in Bagobo, in Ilocano?

REP. NOGRALES. In English, Mr. Speaker.

REP. CAGAS. Thank you.

Mr. Speaker, I am just curious, is there any Rule that...

THE PRESIDING OFFICER (Rep. Fariñas). Hold it. What
is your—is there a point of order or?

REP. CAGAS. I am asking this, Mr. Speaker, because I
have been listening to Tagalog debates. I would rather listen
for the two Congressmen to debate in English or in Bisaya
because the two of them are from Visayas.

REP. BAG-AO. Sakto man, bay. Pwede man kini mag
istorya sa Bisaya. Pero ang punto ko po, ako po ay
nagsasalita sa official language ng Pilipinas. Hindi ko po
alam kung ano po ang bina-violate kong Rule.

REP. CAGAS. Let us speak in English.

THE PRESIDING OFFICER (Rep. Fariñas). Hold it. The
point of the Gentleman from Davao del Sur is, if you could
debate in English. But you have the choice to debate in
Pilipino, if that is your wish.

REP. BAG-AO. Hindi ko po maunawaan kung bakit po
kailangan akong piliting mag-Ingles kung pwede naman po
akong magsalita ng Pilipino.

THE PRESIDING OFFICER (Rep. Fariñas). Pwede kang
mag-Pilipino.

REP. BAG-AO. Naiintindihan naman po ako siguro ng
lahat.

THE PRESIDING OFFICER (Rep. Fariñas). Ipagpatuloy po
ninyo. (Laughter)

REP. BAG-AO. Pero sasagutin na kita, ha?

REP. NOGRALES. Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker.

REP. BAG-AO. Salamat po, Mr. Speaker.

Ulit, sasabihin ko po, may presumption of regularity ang
ating government agency at ang Food and Drug
Administration ay mayroong presumption na may
competency at may kakayahang magbigay sa atin ng tamang
pagsusuri at paglalagay ng contraindications ng mga gamot
na dapat nating i-take. Pero gusto pa natin ng study at maguusap
tayo ng risk, meron din po ako.

Comparative risks of dying, of different activities versus use
of contraceptives. Sa U.S. po, mula kay Trussell: from an
accident, 1:2,900; from being struck by lightning,
1:2,000,000; non-smokers, 35 to 44 using combined
contraceptives, 1:33,000; smoker, 35 to 44, using combined
contraceptives, 1:2,500; undergoing sterilization, 1:66,700;
pregnancy, 1:8,700. Iyon po ang ilang studies na meron ako
kung pag-uusapan po natin ang risks.

REP. NOGRALES. I find it quite disturbing, Mr. Speaker,
that after revealing all of these studies that we could just turn
a blind eye or not look at the studies and see the warnings on
the label. But because we are going to studies, let me go
further to more studies. And this was already brought up by
previous interpellators. The International Agency for
Research Center of the U.N.’s World Health Organization
classified hormonal contraceptives as group one carcinogens
for breast, cervical and liver cancers. ‘Yan, galing na sa U.N.
World Health Organization. This is interesting, Mr. Speaker,
lalung-lalo na sa mga kalalakihan.

Scientists at the University of Missouri found that hormonal
birth control pill has also been associated with prostate cancer
in male children of mothers who take the pill because it has
been found that the oral contraceptive could deform the
prostate gland of the human embryo, and deformities in the
prostate gland have been linked to prostate cancer and
bladder disease in later life.

Ibig pong sabihin nito, isang nanay, umiinom ng birth control
pill, eh hindi niya alam na-miss niya siguro ang isang day,
buntis na pala siya, still taking the oral contraceptive, eh
meron na pala siyang lalaking anak sa loob ng kanyang
womb. Iyong lalaking anak puwede pong magkaroon ng
prostate cancer paglaki po niya.

Also, 2006, the Mayo Clinic Foundation reported that premenopausal
and post-menopausal women who use birth
control pills before the first full-term pregnancy has at least
40% increased risk of developing breast cancer. And women
younger than 46 years old who use the birth control pill for
four or more years prior to the birth of her first child has a 72,
note, 72% risk of developing breast cancer.

Other side effects: venous thromboembolism, the medical
term for blood clots; elevated bad cholesterol;
arteriosclerosis; heart attack; stroke; hypertension; liver
cancer; liver tumors; deep vein thrombosis; heart attacks;
pulmonary embolism; pelvic inflammatory disease;
hypertensive disease; blood pressure rise; liver tumors.

In fact, after reading all of these medical journals, Mr.
Speaker, hindi na po ako nakatiis. Eh kailangan – I need to
find out myself. Huwag po kayong mag-alala, hindi ko po ito
binili sa souvenir shop ng Kongreso. Iyong bag lang po.
Pero pumunta ako sa isang pharmacy.

Pumunta ako sa pharmacy, sinabi ko doon sa pharmacist,
“Bibilhin ko lahat ng mga birth control pills na mayroon kayo
available dito sa pharmacy ninyo.” And so I bought it to find
out what really are we talking about, Mr. Speaker.

Let me start with the first birth control pill na binenta po sa
akin. For the information of everyone in this Congress, I
bought this pill and actually, nabigla po ako sa presyo. Kasi
pagbili ko nito, ang presyo pala nito P729.75. P729.75 for
this pill, eh good for one month lang ito kasi 20-30 tablets
lang ito eh.

So, sinabi ko sa pharmacist, “Bakit napakamahal naman po
niyan, P729? Ibig sabihin, bibili tayo P729 per month?”

Sabi niya, “Eh, Sir, itong birth control pill, hindi po ito birth
control pill lamang kundi nagpapaganda rin po ito ng kutis.”


EXCERPTS FROM UNOFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT OF PERIOD OF INTERPELLATION ON HOUSE BILL No. 4244 – 01 JUNE 2011

Sabi ko, “Talaga, nagpapaganda ng kutis? Bakit?”

“Kasi, nakalagay po dito, ‘Indication: This pill is indicated
for use as oral contraceptive and treatment of moderate
acne.’” So, hindi lang ito oral contraceptive kundi
pampawala rin ng acne. Eh, ang nakakabigla rito, Mr.
Speaker, binili ko ito, readily available sa anong pharmacy
diyan. Ano po ang tatak nito? “Yaz.”


Ito iyong Yaz na ngayong May 31, 2011, sinabi ng
Bloomberg News that “US orders review of risk of some
birth control pills,” suggesting na itong Bayer’s Yaz, ito ang
nakakabigay ng two-fold to three-fold greater risk of blood
clots in women. And anyone can purchase this. At baka ito
rin ang ipamimigay natin sa mga kababaihan natin. Ito po
iyong Bayer’s Yaz. Mayroon ding Yasmin, nadito rin iyan,
pareho po na ibinebenta.

REP. BAG-AO. Ang tingin ko kung mayroon po tayong
usapin tungkol sa kakayahan ng Food and Drug
Administration ay ibang issue ito at hindi ito reproductive
health question kasi ang ina-assume nga natin ay may
regularity ang pagganap ng mga gawain ng mga government
agency.

Pangalawa, iyang mga sinasabi mong maling paggamit ng
mga contraceptives ay talagang dulot ng kakulangan sa
impormasyon. Kaya, napakahalaga ng Reproductive Health
Bill, Mr. Speaker, dahil bahagi ng batas na ito ay hindi lang
iyong usaping contraceptives. Bahagi rin po ng batas na ito
ang pagbibigay ng tamang impormasyon, ang pagbibigay ng
tamang contra-indication, at pagbibigay ng tamang pag-aaral
sa lahat ng mga pamilya para hindi maging iresponsable ang
paggamit nila o pag-adopt ng isang partikular na reproductive
health o family planning method.

Pero para sagutin ko ng konkreto iyong mga studies na nireraise
mo, iyong sinasabi mong study mismo ay mayroon ding
tugon. Tapusin natin iyong study na iyan. At ito ay mula
doon sa UNDP, UNFPA, WHO, World Bank Report,
September, 2005.

Sabi nila: “It is important to note that IARC do not
evaluate the overall risk-benefit profile of compounds in
public health terms even in terms of overall cancer risk
for compounds that have a protective effect on some

cancers and increase the risk of some others. As stated on
IARC’s review, the use of COCs modifies slightly the risk
of cancer, increasing it in some sites – cervix, breast, liver,
decreasing it in others – endometrium, ovaries. Some of
this data refer to older higher-dose COC preparations.
Assessments based on the risk benefit calculations are
carried out by different teams within the World Health
Organization. Several WHO committees work on
creating evidence-based family planning guidelines and
on keeping them up-to-date on a continuous basis. They
regularly review the safety of COCs and assess the
balance of risks and benefit of COC use and they have
determined that for most health women, the health
benefits clearly exceed the health risks.”

Ibig sabihin, kapag nag-usap tayo ng mga studies, talagang
iyong posibilidad, iyong risk, iyong may be, iyong
possibilities ng anumang gamot ay laging nandiyan. Pero,
sinasabi nga nila, mayroon ding mga study na mas naaoutweigh
ng benefit ang health risk. Kaya ang sinasabi natin,
and in the end, Mr. Speaker, ang mahalaga sa diskusyon at sa
debate natin ngayon ay maunawaan na bahagi ng
Reproductive Health Bill at puwede po talaga—kahapon ay
napakahaba ng diskusyon sa medical issues behind
reproductive health—pero in the end, sa akin pong pagunawa,
iyon po ang kahalagahan ng batas na ito, ang
maunawaan ito ng lahat ng mamamayan sa Pilipinas na
gustong magkaroon ng tamang impormasyon sa pagpaplano
ng kanilang pamilya. Alam ninyo ho, bago ako nag law
school, ako po ay community organizer ng isang urban poor
community sa Commonwealth, at ito rin po ang dahilan kung
bakit ako ay nagtatanong kung bakit mahalaga ang batas na
ito. Sa isang taon ko pong pagiging community organizer sa
urban poor community ng Commonwealth, hindi lang po
sampu ang batang nakita kong itinapon sa kanal na bagong
panganak at namatay. Ang tanong ko ho sa sarili ko, bakit
nangyayari iyon?

Kinausap ko ho iyong mga nanay at sabi nila, kasi hindi na
nila kayang alagaan, kasi hindi nila alam kung paano
sisiguraduhin na pwede pala nilang planuhin ang kanilang
pamilya. At kagaya nga po ng sinasabi kong kaso ni Aing
Salve, hindi po siya fiction, siya po ay totoong nanay na may
12 anak at apat na ang namamatay. Ano ang mali sa nangyari
sa kanya? Siya mismo ang nagsabi, “Dahil wala akong
tamang inpormasyon para planuhin ang aking pamilya.” Iyon
po ang isang klarong objective ng batas na ito.

At para po sa mga mahihirap na nanay kagaya ni Aling Salve,
Mr. Speaker, at sa mga kapitbahay niyang urban poor ng
Valenzuela, tingin ko ho obligasyon natin na i-provide ang
batas na ito para siguraduhin na alam nila ang mga
pagpapasyang gagawin nila. Kagaya ng anong gamot ang
tama para sa kanila sa pagpaplano ng kanilang pamilya, ano
ang contra-indications, ano ang ibig sabihin noon at meron
silang magiging basihan para magnilay, mag-aral, intindihin
ang lahat ng mga pamamaraan ng family planning. Ngayon,
hindi naman sila pipilitin ng gobyerno na bumili ng isang
partikular na gamot, Mr. Speaker. In fact, bahagi ng
Reproductive Health Bill na ito ay respetuhin ang kanilang
pagpapasya kung gusto po ng mga pamilya na mag-adopt ng


EXCERPTS FROM UNOFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT OF PERIOD OF INTERPELLATION ON HOUSE BILL No. 4244 – 01 JUNE 2011

natural family planning method, sila din po ay susuportahan
ng gobyerno.

Ang punto lang po natin, hindi po natin pipilitin na mag-
adopt ng isang partikular na pill, mag-adopt ng isang
partikular na metodo, mag-adopt na isang partikular na
pamamaraan ang bawat pamilya kung gusto nilang planuhin
ito. Kung ano po ang kanilang napagpasyahan, ang
responsibilidad nating Mambabatas ngayon ay siguraduhing
bigyan ng kapangyarihan ang gobyernong masuportahan ang
pagpapasyang ito.

REP. NOGRALES. Pero, Mr. Speaker, napakalaki kasi ng
temptation na pills ang kukunin dahil nga binibigay ng libre
ng gobyerno.

Ngayon, let’s go to another type of oral contraceptive pill,
this is Lynestrinol. And here, I mentioned medical studies,


the distinguished
Sponsor also mentioned
medical studies, to
combat iyong medical
studies na inilabas ko.
Pero ito klarong-klaro.

Nakalagay po dito sa

literature ng gamot na ito, “Breast cancer has been found
more often in women who take the pill than in those who
do not take the pill. The risk increases as the woman gets
older. In every 10,000 women who take the pill for up to
five years but stop taking it by age 20, there would be less
than one extra case of breast cancer.” Malas mo na lang
kung ikaw iyong one out of the 10,000.

“In 10,000 women who take the pill for up to five years
but stop taking it by the age of 30, there would be five
extra cases of breast cancer.” Malas mo naman kung sa
10,000, ikaw iyong isa sa limang babae.

And it says here, “In 10,000 women who take the pill for
up to five years but stop by the age of 40, there would be
20 extra cases of women with breast cancer.” Again,
malas mo na lang, cost-benefit ratio, malas mo na lang kung
isa ka sa 20 out of the 10,000 na nagkaroon ng breast cancer
because of the pill. Ang pinag-uusapan naman natin dito is
chance. There’s the chance, 20 out of 10,000.

Thrombosis is the formation of a blood clot which may block
a blood vessel. If this clot breaks away from the veins, it may
reach and block the arteries of the lungs causing a so-called
pulmonary embolism. The risk of thrombosis is higher in pill
users.

Ovarian cyst, small fluid-filled sacs may develop in the
ovaries, these are called ovarian cysts. So, women using the
pill may also develop ovarian cysts. Nasa pangalawang birth
control pill lang po ako. Marami pa po dito. Iba-iba kasi ang
generic name. Eto.

REP. BAG-AO. Maraming salamat, Mr. Speaker. Una,
gusto ko lang po talagang patunayan at gusto ko siyang
pasalamatan ng pagbibigay sa atin ng tamang ebidensiya, ng
tamang inpormasyon kung bakit talaga kailangan na
mayroong RH Bill kasi kailangang-kailangan talaga natin ng
ganyang klase ng information. In fact, iyon pong ini


enumerate, Mr. Speaker, ng kagalang-galang na Kongresman
mula sa Davao ay kailangang-kailangan po natin pagkatapos
nating maipasa ang bill na ito, sapagkat pagkatapos pong
maipasa ang bill na ito, kailangan natin mag-identify ng
products and supplies for modern family planning method,
which shall be part of the national drug formulary and the
same time shall be included in the regular purchase of
essential medicines and supplies of all national and local
hospitals and other government health units.

Mr. Speaker, iyon pong kinukwento ngayon at enumeration
ng mga gamot na mayroong probability at risk ng iba’t ibang
types ng cancer ay mahalagang-mahalagang information,
mahalagang-mahalagang information pagkatapos nating
maipasa ang batas, sapagkat bahagi ng implementasyon ay
ang paga-identify ng mga tamang gamot para maging bahagi
ng essential medicines na kakailanganin natin para
maipatupad ang batas ng reproductive health. Pero isa na
lang study para din na masagot ko ng diretso iyong study na
ipini-present din, ‘no?

Like all drugs and medical devices, contraceptives have
associated risks and side effects. This way, it is not unlike
paracetamol, one of the most effective pain and fever
lowering drugs that no home should be without, or
ampicicillin, the most widely prescribed antibiotic. Yet, the
complete drug literature for paracetamol includes the
information that one can have skin rashes, blood disorder,
swollen pancreas, and severe liver damage that can be fatal.
The same with the literature on ampicicillin, which warns
about nausea, vomiting, loss of appetite, diarrhea, abdominal
pain, allergic reaction, shock and even death.

Iyang mga ganitong information, importanteng-importante
ito. Kaya dapat huwag kakalimutan, Mr. Speaker, ng
kagalang-galang na Kongresman mula sa Davao iyong
kanyang mga literature kasi po kapagka gumawa na po ng
implementing guidelines ang DOH, kapag po gumawa na ng
rules at kapag po nag-identify na tayo ng mga products and
supplies na magiging bahagi ng national drug formulary,
kakailanganin po natin ang mga inpormasyon at ebidensiyang
iyan para siguraduhin na ang mga pamilya na papasok at
pipili ng karapat-dapat na family planning method sa kanila
ay well-informed, may ebidensiyang binatayan ang kanilang
kaalaman, may kakayahan silang magnilay at mamimili sila
ng angkop at tamang gamot para sa kanila. Kaya maraming
salamat po sa information.

REP. NOGRALES. That is why I was asking and I
premised, my line of questioning, Mr. Speaker, on the first
question that I asked. And the first question that I asked: Are
birth control pills part of the policy of this bill? In other
words, if this bill becomes law, then, we will be giving out
birth control pills to our women, which brings us back now to
our original position, which is, we don’t need this law.

And in fact, it will open up, you know, our women to the
possibility of developing so many diseases, so many
sicknesses because we’ll be giving these for free. Iyon nga
iyong point na sinasabi ko. Hindi na natin kailangan gawing
batas ito because right now, as I expose this, as we talk about
the risks, each and every Congressman here now and
Congresswoman is well-informed of the risk.


EXCERPTS FROM UNOFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT OF PERIOD OF INTERPELLATION ON HOUSE BILL No. 4244 – 01 JUNE 2011

That’s put on record, Mr. Speaker. And if you cast your vote
for this bill that means that in your conscience, you are
looking at the risk-benefit ratio, knowing all of these
literatures, knowing all of these studies, alam natin
makakabigay ng sakit sa ating mga kababaihan and yet we
pass this bill. Are we not now saying to our fellow-Filipino
people, that it’s okay to use the pill kasi pinasa natin iyan?

As Representatives of the people, we are now saying,
gumamit ka ng pill kasi kahit na may mga studies na
nagsasabing ito ay nakakasama, ito ay nakaka-cause ng
cancer, ay may mga studies naman na nagsasabing hindi.

So, we are putting our stamp of approval in giving this
government the free rein of giving out these dangerous,
hazardous products, to our women for them to consume and
probably die because of it.

REP. BAG-AO. Mr. Speaker, gusto ko lang pong i-
emphasize na ang national Food and Drug Administration all
over the world, maging sa US at sa Europe, have taken these
life risks into consideration, and have consistently judged that
most of these contraceptive pills are safe. Kaya nga ang
sinasabi po natin, mahalagang-mahalaga ang batas na ito.
Hindi po natin puwedeng sabihin na hindi ito mahalaga.
Kasi, sinasabi natin, ito ay bahagi. At tama, maniniwala ako
na dapat puwede akong mag-take ng gamot. Kasi po – oo.
Kasi po, bahagi ng Reproductive Health Bill, Mr. Speaker, ay
pagbibigay ng kasanayan sa ating mga barangay health
workers, sa ating mga midwives, sa mga ospital, para may
kakayahan silang magbigay ng medical advice, expert
medical advice, sa mga gustong gumamit ng pills na ito. At
magtitiwala po ba ako? Oo, magtitiwala po ako. Kasi bahagi
po ng bill na ito ay pag-angat ng kanilang kasanayan at
pagtitiwala sa gobyerno na sisiguraduhin niyang
susuportahan niya ang anumang pasya ko sa pagpaplano ng
aking pamilya.

Magtitiwala po ba ako sa batas na ito? Kailangan, kasi,
kagaya po ng maraming komunidad na walang access, at ito
po ang isang objective din ng Reproductive Health Bill,
access to family planning services. Ang sinasabi po natin,
kapag po sila ay nabigyan ng tamang impormasyon, may
contraindication: itong gamot na ito ay hindi puwedeng
gamitin kung ikaw ay hypertensive, itong gamot na ito ay
hindi mo puwedeng gamitin kapag ikaw ay may sakit sa atay,
itong gamot na ito ay hindi mo puwedeng gamitin kapag
makaka-cause ito ng sakit sa tiyan. Sasabihin po iyon.
Kapag sinabi po ba ng doctor sa akin, magtitiwala po ba ako?
Opo, kasi ang alam ko po, ang trabaho nila ay siguraduhing
ako ay mabibigyan ng tamang guidance sa pagpipili ng
tamang gamot para sa akin. Kaya, ang sinasabi ko, kung
lahat po ng gamot ay may risks, totoo po iyon. Kaya nga po
may contraindications na nakalagay at bibigyan po tayo ng
tamang advice.

Ang punto po natin, iyon po ang kahalagahan ng
Roproductive Health Bill na ito, ang mabigyan ng tamang
impormasyon ang lahat ng pamilya. Pero ganoon din ang
pagtitiwala na kapag ang mga gamot na ito ay na-determine
at na-identify na safe at essential, at marami din pong mga
organisasyon sa buong mundo, kasama ang World Health
Organization, na nagse-certify ng mga gamot na ito bilang
essential medicine, at magtitiwala po ako sa ganoong klase ng
pagsisiyasat at pagtatakda na ito ay maaaring gamitin, kung
halimbawa, ay bagay ito sa bawat pamilya ang mag-a-adopt
ng isang particular na family planning method. Kasi, nakaindicate
naman po sa gamot ang mga contraindications ng
bawat pill na isa-suggest at ire-recommend ng mga medical
experts sa mga pamilya. Kaya mahalagang-mahalaga ang
batas na ito, Mr. Speaker.


That’s
put
on
record,
Mr.
Speaker.
And
if
you
cast
your
vote
for
this
bill,
that
means
that
in
your
conscience

you
are
looking
at
the
risk
benefit
ratio,
knowing
all
of
these
literatures,
knowing
all
of
these
studies

alam
nating
makakabigay
ng
sakit
sa
ating
mga
kababaihan,
and
yet
we
pass
this
bill.
Are
we
not
now
saying
to
our
fellow
Filipino
people,
that
it’s
okay
to
use
the
pill
kasi
pinasa
natin
iyan?


~Rep. Karlo Nograles, 1st District, Davao